Search for: "U.S. v. Split End Ltd" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am by Marx Sterbcow
Advantage Fund Ltd., 362 F.3d 593, 595-96 (9th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted). [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Google announced an appeal in the 'Innocence of the Muslims' case where actress Cindy Lee Garcia had persuaded Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and a colleague in a split three-judge panel  of U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that she held a copyright in her performance in a trailer for the controversial film, despite appearing for only five seconds - but with dissenting judge N. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Rather than openly confronting the circuit split on corporate liability and deciding the question, the court falls back once again on extraterritoriality (see e.g., Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am by Ben
   This could be an interesting case - and reminds the CopyKat of the recent decision by Mr Justice Birss in Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & another [2012] EWPCC 1 where infringement was found, and the decision by a Korean appellate court that found that the 'recreation' of a photograph of a natural scene of pine trees on an island set against a skyline could not be infringement - although neither of those cases… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
Also at SCOTUSblog, Kevin Russell analyzes the decision in Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:57 am by Paul Karlsgodt
However, the Circuits split on the issue, and the Supreme Court accepted certiorari to resolve the split in the case of Kiobel v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
(Relisted after the May 18 conference)   Returning Relists Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Sykes has now been relisted 14 times, making it (along with Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The low-profile case with a tax angle that I mentioned at the beginning of this column is Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]