Search for: "UNITED STATES FEDERAL BARS FOR THE 9TH, 5TH AND OTHER CIRCUITS "
Results 41 - 60
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2007, 8:18 pm
The Federal Circuit is often grouped with the circuits that have interpreted § 2680(c) expansively because that court ruled in Ysasi v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
With the 5th Circuit long stating that 11 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:14 am
The three cases previously decided by the nation’s 5th, 7th, and 9th Circuit Courts of Appeal are split on the issue of whether class waivers included in an employer’s arbitration agreement are lawful under Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaDocket: 09-1254Issue(s): (1) Whether, in enacting a state statute extending the statute of limitations applicable to claims for the recovery of property stolen during the Holocaust against museums and galleries, the State of California was addressing an area of “traditional state responsibility” without intruding on the federal foreign affairs power; (2) whether a state statute extending the statute of… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 1994). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
The term “vessel” is defined by the United States Code to include “every description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
United States (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-9333 Issue(s): Whether the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Supplemental brief of respondents Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar Amicus brief of CTIA – The Wireless Association Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 10th and 11th Circuits. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Photomedex, slip op. at 5544-45 (9th Circuit pagination is obviously unusual, as the first page here is 5539)Because the Lanham Act is a federal statute, Photomedex, unlike Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaDocket: 09-1254Issue(s): (1) Whether, in enacting a state statute extending the statute of limitations applicable to claims for the recovery of property stolen during the Holocaust against museums and galleries, the State of California was addressing an area of “traditional state responsibility” without intruding on the federal foreign affairs power; (2) whether a state statute extending the statute of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply [read post]
