Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AME v. 125 CASES, MORE OR L" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
#startups nyc london…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2291836513200414722012-07-28 11:42:20 HarvardLaw74: Krista Cox 8 case citation amicus brief in Wiley First Sale case #copyright…quite good [Can a book publisher sell a book at 50 percent off overseas and prevent its import back the United States for a second sale? [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
Defences to Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Canada The leading case on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Canada is the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Beals v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
For example, he has been cited by name in more than 125 Supreme Court opinions – including in Martin v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
For example, he has been cited by name in more than 125 Supreme Court opinions – including in Martin v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am by Pace Law School Library
Drake meets Marcellus: a review of Pennsylvania case law upon the sesquicentennial of the United States oil and gas industry. 6 Tex. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Ortega Santiago, 125 D.P.R. 203, 211 (1990), it was established that:[A]buse of discretion may be manifested in various ways in the judicial sphere. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm by Pace Law School Library
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 1996) ("The nonobviousness of the accused device, evidenced by the grant of a United States patent, is relevant to the issue of whether the change therein is substantial. [read post]