Search for: "UNIVERSAL AM CAN LTD V ATTORNEY GENERAL "
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
In other media law news, the jury in the Stephen Lawrence trial has been told to not read an article by Rod Liddle in the Spectator, which has been referred to the Attorney General for contempt of court. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
For example, R. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
See Wedgetail, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
MBNA Am. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:34 am
The fun and games concerning the General Court's failure in Cases T-253 and 354/09 Wilo v OHIM is/are now over. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Am. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 4:06 pm
In Case T-135/08, Schniga GmbH v Community Plant Variety Office, with interveners Elaris SNC and Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, also dating back to last Monday, the General Court annulled the Office's ruling that a plant variety right should not have been granted for its Gala Schnitzer apple (left) in that the applicant Shniga had failed to comply with requirements made in its individual case. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The very unsatisfactory decision of the House of Lords in Attorney General v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:51 pm
Universal Security Instruments, Inc. / Shanghai Meihao Electric Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:25 am
Similarly, Combined Insurance Group Ltd v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Star Wars producer Lucasfilm fails to win damages over unauthorised replicas of stormtrooper helmets - EWCA decision in Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Trademark Blog) (Class 99) USPTO releases patent pendency simulation tool -… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: PTO Director Jon Dudas announces resignation (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) (Patent Prospector) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Can accused infringers finally escape Marshall? [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC again affirms invalidation of claims to 'means'-defined elements involving a computer algorithm as indefinite: Net MoneyIN v Verisign (IP Updates) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) District Court: Patent term adjustments just got longer: Wyeth v Dudas… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome… [read post]
