Search for: "UNIVERSAL SERVICE V POST-CONFIRMATION"
Results 41 - 60
of 906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Surveillance The Strasbourg Observes blog has a post on the September 2023 decision of Wieder and Guarnieri v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines’s post on X is available to read here. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The post News Roundup appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:05 am
In the post-storm email sent on October 30, 2012, Christie’s stated that their “staff has inspected [their] facility” and could “confirm that [the client’s] property is safe and has experienced no damage. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Number 10 has confirmed there are no plans to change the law to help police crackdown on pro-Palestine demonstrators calling for “jihad” against Israel, Sky News reports. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
Liz Fisher confirms the same about England, by saying that its judges “do not talk of deference in the statutory construction context” but rather announce that “questions of law are questions for the court. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Susan V. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:07 am
For example, in Ryan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
The Importance Of Seeking Legal Counsel In the landmark case Gideon v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:31 pm
” Recent research confirms it can. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
The AAPA has authorized a limited number of 38,500 SIVs, reserved for individuals who had been employed by the U.S. government and provided “faithful and valuable service” as confirmed by, among other things, Chief of Mission approval. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
From Republican National Comm. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
Given the defendants’ admission of knowingly employing the BAYC marks in connection with their RR/BAYC NFTs, the court deemed their usage as intentional, confirming the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
United KingdomMeechan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
SB 261 would embrace a considerably larger universe than the proposed SEC rules because it would cover all large companies, not just the public reporting ones under the SEC’s jurisdiction.[16] Most U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
” 3) European Union Trademarks and Austria: Famous mark PUMA beats “PUMA Multipower” for dissimilar goods by Katharina Schmid “We all know that highly famous marks enjoy a kind of “universal” protection for (almost) any goods and services. [read post]
