Search for: "UNKNOWN PARTIES, Does 1-100"
Results 41 - 60
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
A mediated settlement agreement is binding under section 6.602 of the Family Code if the agreement: (1) provides, in a prominently displayed statement that is in boldfaced type or capital letters or underlined, that the agreement is not subject to revocation; (2) is signed by each party to the agreement; and (3) is signed by the party’s attorney, if any, who is present at the time the agreement is signed. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Cratsley submits that New York law does not place a legal duty upon an individual who lacks control over the third party's actions. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
(b) Approved forms.(1) Contested actions. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
(b) Approved forms.(1) Contested actions. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
Senate Bill 276 does two things. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:52 am
The court explained that the parties agreed to the 70%-30% split before the purchase of SBI was completed. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
" If the court finds there is no clear intent – which is often the case in dealing with a later developed technology -- the court may decide the matter based on social policy considerations.[1] That is, when the intent of the parties -- the Holy Grail in contract interpretation -- cannot be ascertained, courts apply “off the rack” rules to decide what they feel the proper result should be. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
" If the court finds there is no clear intent – which is often the case in dealing with a later developed technology -- the court may decide the matter based on social policy considerations.[1] That is, when the intent of the parties -- the Holy Grail in contract interpretation -- cannot be ascertained, courts apply “off the rack” rules to decide what they feel the proper result should be. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
" If the court finds there is no clear intent – which is often the case in dealing with a later developed technology -- the court may decide the matter based on social policy considerations.[1] That is, when the intent of the parties -- the Holy Grail in contract interpretation -- cannot be ascertained, courts apply “off the rack” rules to decide what they feel the proper result should be. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
In states where one party held sway, the legislature voted for the party stalwart. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
Claims 1 and 6 of the granted patent read as follows:"1. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 2:50 pm
Including intervening parties is really the only way to resolve outstanding and unknown obligations of the divorcing parties. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:17 am
How does an NIT work? [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
It can be falsified by showing (1) that the defendant’s test or study was not sufficiently reliable to permit one to conclude with reasonable certainty that it establishes the proposition for which it was cited, or (2) that the test, while sufficiently reliable, does not establish the proposition claimed in defendant’s advertising. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:02 am
There are many unknowns in this nascent field that undoubtedly will be fleshed out over time. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 5:17 pm
It is unknown the reason for throwing away the forms, but the following theories have been suggested: 1. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
Now, in order to call an early election, parliament must either (1) vote by two-thirds [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm
PT) by dialing 1-800-319-4610 (toll-free) or +1-604-638-5340 (international). [read post]
