Search for: "US Ex Rel. Free v. Peters"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
As the case against May & Tucker buckled, the advocate depute contacted the then Lord Advocate, Lord Peter Fraser, now Ministerial Complaints adviser to Alex Salmond, who concurred the case should be dropped, even though it was by then clear to many onlookers, there was a gay Scottish judges connection with Thailand’s gay boy industry. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
Peter Orszag, who ran the OMB (Office of Management and Budget), admitted to Klein that he didn’t come to the realization that the country’s economy was “in a Reinhart-Rogoff situation until 2010. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:09 pm
In County of Kauai ex rel. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
The Health Care "Market"Bremmer does not talk much about health care in his book, but it appears to be one important sector where the relative role of the government in state capitalist and "free market" regimes is flipped. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 8:22 am
City University of New York
BRONX COUNTYCriminal Practice
Re-Sentencing to PRS Over Year After Imposed Sentence Served Violates Expectation of Finality
People (ex rel. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
Ct. 930 (1890).But see also, Louisiana ex reI. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435 (7th Cir. 1984); (holding that informant's use of electronic surveillance device in defendant's home did not violate the Fourth Amendment); United States v. [read post]
