Search for: "US Securities and Exchange Commission v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
A National Security Council spokeswoman did not reply to a request for comment. . . . [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by David Kris
Smith, upholding a conviction in which “the government had illegally accessed a voicemail message from the defendant that suggested that he was involved in insider trading,” and the “voicemail led the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate the defendant,” which in turn ultimately led to his conviction for violating securities laws. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether the SEC can seek disgorgement of profits as a judicial remedy for violating the securities-fraud laws, and Opati v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” Proposed FEC Rule Would Further Constrain Foreign Election Contributions National Public Radio – Philip Ewing | Published: 8/1/2019 The FEC proposed new rules to outlaw exchanges like the one that took place when a Russian delegation visited Trump Tower in 2016 to offer Donald Trump’s campaign “dirt” on Democrats. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:04 am by ccollins
Based on a complaint brought also in 2016 by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Aequitas is accused of misleading investors about the extent their money became involved in for-profit education company Corinthian Colleges, which filed for bankruptcy in 2015. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:52 am by ccollins
Hoffman, is now facing fraud charges brought by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the court held that a defendant can be charged with violating federal law barring fraudulent securities schemes if he distributed, but did not make, false statements. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Jack, 2018 BCSC 610 where Justice Smith held that Google was not able to show that the global delisting order made against it violated its First Amendment rights in the U.S. or the core values of the U.S. or that the California order undermined the effectiveness of the Equustek order. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission that a defendant can be charged with violating federal law barring fraudulent securities schemes if he distributed, but did not make, false statements. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
The internet’s global reach allows perpetrators to operate from remote locations and attack victims in the perceived security of their own homes. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:15 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
While the dosage was kept confidential, the agreements were reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:05 pm by Amy Howe
Varjabedian (April 15): In a lawsuit alleging violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether a private plaintiff has to show that a person who made a false statement intended to do so, or whether it is enough that the false statement was made negligently Parker Drilling Management Services v. [read post]