Search for: "US v. Antonio Garcia"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2016, 8:41 am
San Antonio Metro. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); see also Garcia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
Garcia Holiday Tours, Et Al. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Fellow blogger, tweeter and IP enthusiast Thomas Dubuissontells us about a larger than life dispute between Google and Oracle that is rumbling through the courts in the US. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm
The City of San Antonio, No. 11-0104. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm
Garcia and Xavier Rodriguez, have said that they had an obligation to draw interim maps because the plans that emerged from the state legislature cannot be used in any form until they get Washington clearance. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
[Seminole Tribe v Florida, 116 S. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
Garcia, the state asked the justices to review a decision by the Kansas Supreme Court that reversed Ramiro Garcia’s conviction for identity theft after he used someone else’s Social Security number. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:59 am
The lawsuit is generally filed on behalf of one of the plaintiffs listed below: Scott Johnson Brian Whitaker Antonio Fernandez Orlando Garcia James Zarian Nehemiah Kong Luis Marquez Most commonly these days, the lawsuit is filed in Superior Court for the State of California – often the County of Los Angeles. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
Chief Justice Roberts, still haunted by the ghost of Lochner, may be trending towards Garcia v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
” Garcia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Garcia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:30 pm
—San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding); see also Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:13 pm
San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority set out the requirement for local governments to pay overtime to their eligible public employees for such use of their time. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Each identified victim will receive between US$30,000 and US$65,000, with larger sums going to children, women and older persons due to their particular vulnerabilities. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
I, § 8, cl. 3 Subsequently, Usery was limited by Garcia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
Although Wickard has engendered opposition, it has in no sense proven "unworkable," see Garcia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
We can solve the cycling problem by drawing an analogy here to Garcia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Essentially, the states are asking the judiciary to overturn a landmark Supreme Court decision Garcia v. [read post]
