Search for: "US v. Antonio Garcia"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 12:49 pm
" US v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); see also Garcia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
Garcia, 253 S.W.3d 653, 655 (Tex. 2008). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
Although Wickard has engendered opposition, it has in no sense proven "unworkable," see Garcia v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm
The City of San Antonio, No. 11-0104. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 2:56 pm
Garcia, 108 S.W.3d 464 (Tex. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
To critics of the Act, this means that Section 5 has outlived its usefulness. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:30 pm
—San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding); see also Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:52 am
Garcia v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm
Garcia and Xavier Rodriguez, have said that they had an obligation to draw interim maps because the plans that emerged from the state legislature cannot be used in any form until they get Washington clearance. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
Garcia Holiday Tours, Et Al. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm
Usery was quickly overruled in Garcia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Antonio Garcia Rodriguez involved an undocumented worker who was injured while doing roofing work at the University of Louisiana-Lafayette. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Antonio Garcia Rodriguez, arose out of an injury sustained by Antonio Rodriguez while doing roofing work at the University of Louisiana-Lafayette. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
(Response due January 27, 2011) Jan 26 2011Brief of respondent Antonio Garcia Rodriguez in opposition filed. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
I, § 8, cl. 3 Subsequently, Usery was limited by Garcia v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
[Seminole Tribe v Florida, 116 S. [read post]
