Search for: "US v. Benjamin General"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The defendant failed to file a defence and the court awarded $90,000 in general and aggravated damages. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:09 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
In the process it exposes for order complexities and challenges, for the human, of efforts to regulate or engage with, not the generative autonomous “artificial intelligences” humanity created in its own image, but rather the use of those systems by humans and their effects in the human semiosphere. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
First, the law requires some business to verify the age of users using age verification software. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Moreover, companies could use their power “to influence the political and regulatory sphere where businesses engage political processes in support of policies that respond to their own interest and priorities, even when such policies are inconsistent with human rights protection and promotion”.[3] Recognizing that every time companies exercise power raises questions related to the rule of law, we initiate this Fall Talks Series on the Rule of Law and Corporate Actors. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
§§ 3161-3174. [7] Benjamin M. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Moreover, although courts should exercise caution in accepting new torts, it is legitimate to do so “where the interests are worthy of protection and the development is necessary to stay abreast of social change” (at para 50, citing Merrifield v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205 (CanLII)). [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Similarly, the SEC and the other regulatory users of CAT have little incentive to be judicious in their use of CAT queries.[5] The SROs, which in the funding model before us today bear a third of the cost, do care about constraining costs.[6] They have pushed back on certain elements of the plan and are even litigating with us on some features of CAT. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
In Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
While the ongoing negotiations in Kyiv, New York, and beyond have generated copious commentary, the regional context of Russia’s invasion is often overlooked or misunderstood, with many analysts taking an unduly negative, glass “half empty” view on the proposed tribunal. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Project Veritas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Rules themselves vary--let's use hard and soft to refer to the poles of a continuum. [read post]
