Search for: "US v. Butterworth"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Butterworth, 756 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2000)...................................................................................................17 Asay v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Butterworth, 756 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2000)...................................................................................................17 Asay v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:10 pm
See Vance v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:20 am
Butterworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
First, judges should be more prepared than they perhaps have been in the past to use the powers available to them to disallow the cost of the preparation and use of excessive written material, whatever the outcome of the case. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:36 pm
(Toronto: Butterworths, 1987), at p. 203. 17 Finally, the Supreme Court of Canada in McInerney v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:02 am
A recent Appeals Court case, Wess v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Butterworth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Doe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:06 am
The 15th episode of Cautious v IPOff, chronicled weekly by the PatLit weblog, can be perused here. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:11 am
In this vein of thought the IPKat turns to LB Europe Ltd (trading as Dupont Liquid Packaging Systems) v Smurfit Bag in Box SA and another [2007] EWHC 510 (Pat), a Patents Court decision last Thursday from Roger Wyand QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, which seems to have escaped the attention of everyone except LexisNexis Butterworths' subscription service.LB and Smurfit both made and sold flexible 'bag-in-box' liquid packages containing tap units made… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm
” The same approach should be adopted when courts are considering whether a defendant using the section 4 defence had a reasonable belief that the statement complained of was in the public interest. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
However, in 2006 in Blank v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
This may prove particularly useful for applicants chasing rogues who have absconded overseas. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
US Law and Media News Once again, this will (eventually) be the subject of a separate post From the Blogs The Guardian’s interesting new blog “Butterworth and Bowcott on Law” has a piece about the new provision which permits statements in open court to be made in privacy claims (the subject of a post by us on 30 March). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
(Markham, Ont.: Butterworths, 2002); Lewis N. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:56 pm
He's talking about PennWell Publishing (UK) Limited v Isles and others, a Queen's Bench Division from Judge Justin Fenwick QC on Monday, 18 June, which was picked up by the LexisNexis Butterworths subscription-only service.PennWell was a business to business media company that ran conferences, exhibitions and research covering strategic global markets. [read post]
