Search for: "US v. Butterworth"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2011, 5:06 am
The 15th episode of Cautious v IPOff, chronicled weekly by the PatLit weblog, can be perused here. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Burlington, MA Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
In her discussion of the recent decision in Metropolitan Schools v Designtechnica ([2010] EWHC 2411 (QB)) – posted by us on 30 October – Siobhain Butterworth draws attention to the oddity of the case. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
That makes the Reynolds privilege defence so uncertain as to be of little practical use. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm
This legislation is unnecessary – since the 1992 case of Matusevitch v Telnikoff it has been clear that the US courts will not enforce foreign libel judgments where the local law does not apply US First Amendment standards. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
The well-known and much used defence arises from the 1999 case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers in which the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) extended the defence of qualified privilege to cover the media. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The view of the learned editors of Duncan & Neill (Duncan and Neil on Defamation (Butterworths, 3rd edition, 2009), at 17.26. is that it can but the better view, which was assumed to be the case by at least two of their lordships in Reynolds (at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) is that it cannot. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
First, judges should be more prepared than they perhaps have been in the past to use the powers available to them to disallow the cost of the preparation and use of excessive written material, whatever the outcome of the case. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
In last week’s case (Friedmann v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
; R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
I believe that the oldest use of media other than print to teach legal research was a videotape with voice-over by Stephen Borins back in the academic year, 1970-1971 in which he ran through a legal research problem which touched on Priestman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
There may well be other cases rejecting presumed reliance claims that we didn't find if they didn't use the magic words "fraud on the market. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
At US$225 it's fairly priced, given the relatively small and specialist market. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:32 pm
In R. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
(Markham, Ont.: Butterworths, 2002); Lewis N. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:13 pm
(London: Butterworths, 1953), vol. 3, at 69, and to what was said by Finch C.J.B.C. in Brophy v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:04 am
[57] In Barker v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
(London: Butterworth, 1923) at p. 346. [read post]
