Search for: "US v. Daniel Stone"
Results 41 - 60
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
This week marked 10 years since former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden exposed the mass surveillance practice employed by the UK and US. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
” At Salon, Daniel Denvir looks back at the Court’s decision in Voisine v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:54 pm
Supreme Court rules in the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am
Conversely, the Artpusher case resulted in a ruling against the gallery, emphasizing that trademark law does not harbor a parody exception akin to that in copyright law, marking a clear boundary for artists and commercial entities alike regarding the use of trademarks in art, especially for commercial purposes.In the Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
Daniel Byman argued that Trump’s refugee policy will increase terrorism, which in turn will help Trump. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am
*State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:12 am
Stone of ... [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Attorney General further dilutes the restrictions on the use of force famously established by Public Committee Against Torture v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:54 pm
For a good discussion, see this article by Daniel Kelly. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
McCaffrey and Birney allege covert surveillance was used against them in an attempt to reveal their source for an allegedly leaked document from the Police Ombudsman’s office, which appeared in their documentary No Stone Unturned on the 1994 UVF massacre in Loughinisland, Co Down. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The same could also apply to a company registration.Is this a new cause of action for us trade mark lawyers to start waving around? [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
Parliamentarians, including former Brexit Secretary David Davis, former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Green MP Caroline Lucas and human rights organisations have called on the retail group owned by Mike Ashley to stop using facial recognition surveillance in their stores. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Accord Tourgeman v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Accord Tourgeman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Jardines a case involving the use of drug-sniffing dogs. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
& Pol’y Rev. 356-390 (2010).Stone, Chad. [read post]
