Search for: "US v. Donald Franks" Results 41 - 60 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2021, 6:45 pm
But it is essential to face this challenge with the greatest possible understanding of the complex national and international context, aware that the world has changed dramatically and there are too many closed doors for nations with fewer resources and many more for those of us who strive to be sovereign. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
Frank Bowman recently published an essay in Lawfare that criticized arguments I made in an essay on the site. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Frank argued that the lay attitude towards law is naïve. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that he would nominate a woman to fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
”  The U.S Department of the Treasury issued guidance on President Donald J. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 1:48 pm by Andrew Hamm
Sierra Club is a challenge to President Donald Trump’s border wall. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am by John Jascob
" These were people used to being lionized, said Frank, and now they were being yelled at. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat, who co-authored the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which created the CFPB. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm by Deepak Gupta
The latest irregularities at the Department of Justice—a tweet by President Donald Trump, an abrupt about-face and the walkout of an entire prosecution team, all in the same day—remind us of the need to ensure that at least some government functions are independent of direct presidential control. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Bowman III argues that the theories used by Donald Trump’s defense team are not grounded in law and create a dangerous precedent for future presidents to completely obstruct congressional oversight of the executive branch. [read post]