Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 41 - 60 of 50,985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 12:18 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
[Note to readers: This morning, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Moore v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Daniel Shaviro
And, given the basis for decision, it holds that issues about taxing unrealized income simply aren't reached here.Bad news: the Supreme Court has at least 4 votes (and possibly as many as 6) in support of the proposition that Eisner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:32 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Given applicant’s improvement in pain and decreased medication use after completing eight sessions, the IMR reviewer correctly concluded that additional sessions were supported by the MTUS and ODG criteria.] [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:23 pm by Antonios Baris
The District Court accepted the argumentation of the Second Circuit Court of Appeal in Sohm v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am by am33013w
Given its commercial nature (attempting to convince consumers to use fossil fuel products), greenwashing stands to receive less protection than other types of speech. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In the absence of a statutory definition, we construe words of ordinary import with their usual and commonly understood meaning, and in that connection have regarded dictionary definitions as useful guideposts in determining the meaning of a word or phrase" (Matter of Walsh v New York [*3]State Comptroller, 34 NY3d at 524 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Schwabler v DiNapoli, 194 AD3d 1235, 1237 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In the absence of a statutory definition, we construe words of ordinary import with their usual and commonly understood meaning, and in that connection have regarded dictionary definitions as useful guideposts in determining the meaning of a word or phrase" (Matter of Walsh v New York [*3]State Comptroller, 34 NY3d at 524 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Schwabler v DiNapoli, 194 AD3d 1235, 1237 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Such use of businesses' or people's names for obvious criticism is generally seen as legally permissible, see, e.g., Lamparello v. [read post]