Search for: "US v. James Harper"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
That is the central reason why James Madison, seconded by James Wilson, first moved on June 1 that the Executive be vested with the power “to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Lewis v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am
David Kravets at Wired reports on a petition for certiorari that was filed recently in Harper v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
An extract explaining the project’s origin appeared in Harper’s Magazine here. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
James, or any of the other “classic” writers. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
In a ruling that appears to be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, Master Harper of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory held that the lawyer could use the social networking site to serve court notices.1 The Facebook profiles showed the co-defendants’ dates of birth, email addresses and ‘friend’ lists and declared the co-defendants to be friends of one another. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The words we use provide a filter through which we view and acknowledge legal concepts. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:55 am
This is why Comcast v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Adam Quentin Voyles, McKenna Harper, for Crawford Industrial Services, LLC, Appellee. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
The issue was raised at the Leveson Inquiry during David Allen Green’s evidence when a letter by Times’ editor James Harding was read out. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Harper & James, in their tort treatise, said much the same thing: "conformity to the legislative standard. . .may so clearly constitute due care under the circumstances of any given case that the court will decide it does as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Harper asks whether the North Carolina Supreme Court violated the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:55 am
Because Smith had not been properly appointed, she found that he was not entitled to use the “indefinite appropriation” established by the Department of Justice. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:10 am
Let’s take a few more months, listen to the Supreme Court of Canada (which brought us the landmark CCH v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
They may enable us to get a keener insight into our society and its problems. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Harper Ho, J.A. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Two years ago, when a splintered Supreme Court approved lethal injection as a means of execution in Baze v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
Much conversation has focused on some variation of “what technology is doing to us. [read post]
