Search for: "US v. John Hughes" Results 41 - 60 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am by Karen Tani
Over at Balkinization, an interesting conversation is unfolding on the uses of history in Supreme Court decisionmaking, especially as pertains to the recent Haaland v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Parliamentarians, including former Brexit Secretary David Davis, former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Green MP Caroline Lucas and human rights organisations have called on the retail group owned by Mike Ashley to stop using facial recognition surveillance in their stores. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
”  Emily Hammond does the same for the power plant preemption case Hughes v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In re TC Heartland LLC (on mandamus to the Fed Cir. 2015) (read-it: Heartland Mand) An interesting mandamus action was recently filed by the Prof John Duffy and Jim Dabney (both now with Hughes Hubbard) raising the following: Whether 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Hughes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Smith     Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 09a0070n.06  John Cleary v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Smith     Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 09a0070n.06  John Cleary v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:47 am by Terry Hart
Emphasis on “goo” – authors point out the many fallacies of Google’s book scanning defense — John Degen runs us through a memorandum filed by the Author’s Guild in opposition to Google’s fair use defense that it has raised in the ongoing Google Book Search lawsuit. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
This post was triggered by a recent licensing agreement from John Deere, one of the largest US tractor manufacturers, which covers software embedded in John Deere’s machines and forces farmers to seek repairs only from licensed dealers. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
(Source: Good Little Robot)The legislative position is not any different, according to the Court, from the common law position as set out in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons (discussed more here), which restricted the rights in items that have been sold (albeit in relation to copyright and not patent rights). [read post]