Search for: "US v. Khan"
Results 41 - 60
of 573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 3:27 pm
Williamson v Khan. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:54 am
As blogged by us here, this remake is seeing a copyright controversy over the use of the original script of Zanjeer written by Salim Khan and Javed Akthar. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
And the expanding contexts in which users’ personal data is used—from health care and housing to employment and education—mean that what’s at stake with unlawful collection, use, retention, or disclosure is not just one’s subjective preference for privacy, but one’s access to opportunities in our economy and society, as well as core civil liberties and civil rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:01 am
Last week, in Parsons Inc. v Khan, 2021 FC 57, the Federal Court found the owner of a phishing website liable for passing itself off as the Applicants’, Parsons Corporation and Parsons Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:01 am
Last week, in Parsons Inc. v Khan, 2021 FC 57, the Federal Court found the owner of a phishing website liable for passing itself off as the Applicants’, Parsons Corporation and Parsons Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 11:54 am
Therefore, even if Khan is legally detained for other, valid reasons, it seems to me that we cannot use the fact -- the fortuity -- of his detention as an excuse for preventing his public speech that would otherwise be constitutionally privileged.Am I missing something? [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:30 am
(This information does not, in other words,fall within one of the small handful of categories of information -- such as the direction of future troop movements (see Near v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 5:37 am
This is a guest post from Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan For a paper I have been working on (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2610576), I am looking for comments on applying GATT disciplines (such as Art.I, III, V and XI) as well as the General Exception rule in Art.XX d) to national IP protection and enforcement measures that go beyond the multilateral standards in TRIPS. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Furthermore, weight was also placed on the employee’s actions in following the Claimant on to the forecourt and telling him, using threatening language, to never come to the premises again. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:49 am
From his order (via Professor Berman's site):Last year in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 opinion in Eastman Kodak v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Khan [2014] EWCA Civ 41 A rather odd second appeal from a s.204 appeal decision. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Khan [2014] EWCA Civ 41 A rather odd second appeal from a s.204 appeal decision. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:24 am
Under the US Supreme Court ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 11:46 am
No. 42 v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:25 am
Last week the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas gave us some insight into the current state of guns laws in Texas and the availability of a self-defense claim handing out a decision entitled State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Cammack, among others, was concerned that these positions are being over used and not properly advertised to potential applicants. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
The case is USA v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Khan responded abusively, using racist language towards Mr Mohamud (who was of Somali decent) before following him onto the petrol station forecourt and into his car. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
