Search for: "US v. Marcus Jones" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
Here's the latest on the expert analysis of the software:  While CMI, the Intoxilyzer 5000 manufacturer, has yet to provide us reasonable access, Marsh Halberg, one of the other lead attorneys, has made significant progress. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:12 am
[from yahoo.sports, discussing the Jags victory over the Jets on 15 Nov 09] Note Jones-Drew later said: "We knew they were pretty much going to let us score. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Nonetheless, defense counsel objected to the prosecutor's use of Jones's statement, arguing that the prejudicial effect of the admission of its contents outweighed its probative value.... [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
Other sources claim tiles or pottery-shards were used.) [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
While individual cities may be able to negotiate a longer lease for stadium venues, or write provisions in leases that would deter teams from leaving their cities, there is very little that fans can do to avoid paying substantial costs to see their home teams. [26] In the past, fans have tried to use lease agreements between the city and the sports team to challenge increased prices. [27] In Heidrick v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
It's a 74 page note by Anne Gilson LaLonde on the protection in the United States of foreign trade marks that are well known in the US but aren't actually being used there. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
It was introduced into US state law nearly 30 years ago and the first execution by this method was in 1982. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Jones, 395 F.3d 577, 602 (6th Cir. 2005) (applying the Schlup standard to determine whether a late-filed claim should be equitably tolled under AEDPA), we reverse. 07a0346p.06 2007/08/28 USA  v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Precedents of Indictments and Pleas, Adapted to the Use Both of the Courts of the United States and Those of All the Several States 1 v. (1849) Wharton, Francis. [read post]