Search for: "US v. Mark Johnson" Results 41 - 60 of 1,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
When the defendants refused to give up the mark, the claimant brought a claim in the IPEC for an injunction to prohibit the defendants’ use of the mark. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania case of Johnson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:54 am
February 26, 2015 - 10 AM: Pandora Jewelry, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
"Johnson alleged that it has used its marks since at least the 1940s and that it has a share of the market exceeding 79%. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
As such, a name carries immense weight and importance to some, even if it is 'generic' such as Smith or Johnson. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm by Sme
This case also adopts the "parking lot rule" that a parking lot used by employees is part of the employer's premises) *Johnson v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
May 3 marked the 60th anniversary of a little known case of American civil rights:  Hernández v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:24 am by John L. Welch
Alternatively, Cook could have sought a consent from the registrant.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: For a discussion of the difference between partial cancellation under Section 14 and restriction or modification of a registration under Section 18, see Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Legal Talk Network
  This led to the use of as robot, the Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman and a pound of C-4 explosive, which was sent in eventually killing the sniper. [read post]