Search for: "US v. Mark Lambert"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm
In City of Boerne v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Raymond Niro, who had a towering influence over the practice of patent litigation.* Genuine use of three dimensional EU trade marks - heated arguments over ovensMark Schweizer summarises the CJEU appeal on a 3D oven mark (EUTM), which reminds everybody that registering a mark is only part of the game – you also need to enforce your mark, or you risk losing it. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
Also, since questions 11 and 12 relate to matters of opinion, your answers will not count towards the total which will be marked out of 10. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:59 pm
In its decision the District Court took account of – and came to the same conclusion as – the UK High Court’s Warner-Lambert v Activis decisions (Lyrica – January 2015). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
Authored by Mark Flanagan, Patrick Carome and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Hale. * GitHub Letter. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
In response to Brian's question as to whether Mark was optimistic that we are nearing a solution on second medical use, Mark stated that he was. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
In 2015, readers could see him put his mental martial arts to test in AP Racing v Alcon [2015] EWHC 1371, Warner-Lambert v Actavis on behalf of the Highland Health Board [2015] EWHC 72 and Global Flood Defence System v Van den Noort Innovations [2015] EWHC 153. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] – BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] – Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Darren reports.* YouTube to defend clear examples of fair use, even in courtYouTube to litigate copyright infringement/fair use actions on behalf of users harassed by subject to inappropriate DMCA takedown requests? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] – Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP |… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
| How cool is TMView | The "crowded field" in trade mark law | Genetic patents | US Court of Appeal for the 2nd Circuit and Google Books. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Katfriend and occasional guest contributor Aaron Wood tells all.* Invalidating an absent litigant's trade marks: yes, of course it can be doneJeremy further reflects on Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
| IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funkNever Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies… [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:32 am
Incidentally, the 81,423-wordjudgment does not contain the W word ...There has just fallen onto the desk of this Kat the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold at first instance following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 122 Cal. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt: Garcia v Google… [read post]
