Search for: "US v. Marrero-Marrero"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
The decision has overturned in part District Judge Marrero's earlier decision on whether Louboutin could use its trade mark red lacquered sole to prevent the sale of Yves Saint Laurent's red-soled red shoe. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
The appeals court is expected to decide Louboutin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Judge Marrero confirmed the award. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
In the Second Circuit the test for aesthetic functionality was laid down in Wallace International Silversmith v Godinger Silver Art (1990). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:17 am
That million dollar award has been remitted to $50,000.First, Judge Marrero awarded $102,000 in front pay, through 2014. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
As such it is the use of a single color on any "fashion item", which Marrero J held was not protectable even where the color has achieved a secondary meaning, that is of paramount concern for brands such as Tiffany.The Burden of ProofTiffany's brief argued that Judge Marrero's blanket rule was unnecessary and sweeping and there was "no need to issue a broad edict forbidding trademark protection for color marks in an entire industry. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
However, last week Judge Victor Marrero denied the injunction. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
In his thirty-two page decision, Judge Marrero compared fashion designers to painters and noted how creativity for both is dependant upon using color as "an indispensable medium" that "plays a unique role. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:46 am
Christian Louboutin SA et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:59 am
Christian Louboutin's Distinctive Red OutersolesIn Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
(picture, right - the offending Yves Saint Laurent shoe)During a hearing last Thursday, US District Judge Victor Marrero stated that he would decide on whether to grant Louboutin's request for a preliminary injunction "as soon as possible". [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am
[Dixon], [Felix] Marrero, and several others entered the lobby seconds later. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:23 pm
” Marrero v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:11 pm
Readers of this blog may recall that in September 2010, Judge Victor Marrero entered a significant ruling in the case, in which he granted the defendants’ motion, in reliance on the Morrison v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Victor Marrero) - Morrison warrants dismissal where plaintiff had purchased a Norwegian securities firm's fund-linked notes arranged by a US bank for sale to US investors. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:05 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
