Search for: "US v. McDonald" Results 41 - 60 of 1,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 1:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Cohen (Drexel University - Earle Mack School of Law) has posted The Paradox of McDonald v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm by David Kopel
The following exchange took place during James Feldman’s oral argument today, on behalf of the Chicago government, in McDonald v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
Although the case has been very widely reported on in the IP community and the wider press, some nuance has been lost in the discourse on the case and what it ultimately means.The case of Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd v McDonald's International Property Company Ltd concerned the trademark for the iconic Big Mac, which McDonald's had registered as an EU trademark in 1998 (EUTM 62638). [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
Although the case has been very widely reported on in the IP community and the wider press, some nuance has been lost in the discourse on the case and what it ultimately means.The case of Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd v McDonald's International Property Company Ltd concerned the trademark for the iconic Big Mac, which McDonald's had registered as an EU trademark in 1998 (EUTM 62638). [read post]
  Perhaps the most well known (albeit convoluted) perception of a frivolous lawsuit is that of Stella Liebeck v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
Robert Cottrol is a professor at the George Washington University Law School who has written on the Second Amendment, including a 1991 Georgetown Law Journal article, “The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration,” which was cited by Justice Thomas in his concurring opinion in McDonald  Yesterday’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:56 pm by Thomas Crocker
The Supreme Court’s awaited case in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I don’t have much that’s original or interesting to say about the historical and jurisprudential arguments made by the majority and the dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:46 pm by Dan Ernst
Alison LaCroix has blogs on "the Use and Misuse of Legal History in McDonald" on the University of Chicago's Law Faculty Blog. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:20 pm
Heller, and who’s counsel of record in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:55 pm by Larry Munn
Silcorp Ltd (1989) and McDonald’s Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:54 am by sally
Regina (McDonald) v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2011] UKSC 33; [2011] WLR (D) 218 “A local authority had been entitled to withdraw the funding for a night-time carer to assist a disabled person to use a commode when required, and to instead provide her with incontinence pads to wear at night. [read post]