Search for: "US v. Monell"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2018, 12:00 pm
As The Chronicle notes, this interpretation of the statute was upheld in a 1978 US Supreme Court Ruling (Monell v New York City Department of Social Services 436 US 658). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:49 am
See Monell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals tells us. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
On cross motions for summary judgment, citing Monell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
On cross motions for summary judgment, citing Monell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Most warnings concern a product’s use – that if you use (or don’t use) the product in a certain way, you are likely to get hurt; and if you follow the warning, you won’t. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
Involuntary transfers and an internal investigation also supported her claim (Thomas v County of Riverside, August 18, 2014, per curiam). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:28 pm
But the courts do surprise us with a little municipal liability from time to time.The case is Okin v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:13 pm
Monell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
Rauen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:55 pm
Drug and Device Law points us to an article in Saturday's Wall Street Journal: Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Monell claims are also tough. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm
In 1978’s Monell v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:37 am
Arizona filed an interlocutory appeal of the injunction and the county sought review of the Monell holding (the appeal of the Monell issue was dismissed for lack of pendent jurisdiction). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
***JUSTICE GINSBURG: Did -JUSTICE KENNEDY: The Chief Justice's question reminds me somewhat of our rule in Monell under 1983: A city is not liable for a -- a constitutional violation unless it has a policy. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Ever since this blog started, we’vemadeplainthat we have no use for the so-called “heeding presumption. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:57 am
Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Monell v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm
Ullman, extolling the use of the Due Process Clause to identify changing concepts of personal liberty. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:19 pm
Hopkins v. [read post]
