Search for: "US v. Pryor" Results 41 - 60 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2007, 10:58 am
Mark Pryor, D-Ark., the sponsor of the Child Safe Viewing Act [S.602], claims that the new law is necessary because content is no longer confined to the TV or radio, and he contends the same technology that allows content to increasingly migrate from device to device also can be used to empower parents. [read post]
The case originated from DeSantis’s decision to suspend Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warren in August 2022 following the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by David Oscar Markus
Pryor starts off this way:This appeal requires us to decide whether a police officer violated the Fourth Amendment when he removed a round of live ammunition and a holster from the pocket of a suspect during a protective frisk, see Terry v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Tony Francois highlights Foster v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am by Orin Kerr
Pryor relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Soldal v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
Dicta refer to “those portions of an opinion that are not necessary to deciding the case then before us. [read post]