Search for: "US v. Rogers" Results 41 - 60 of 3,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
He has urged US Congress to take “immediate action” by making a simple clarification that publishers should be compensated for the use of their content in the training and output of generative AI tools and that licensing deals must be struck for onward future use. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am by Samuel Bray
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics bk. v, ch. 11, 1137b (Roger Crisp ed., 2000). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by SHG
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
The FBI and Capitol Police are investigating remarks reportedly made by Roger J. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
The course will likely be seven 2-hour sessions, with (I'm hoping) some excellent guests joining us. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am by INFORRM
  He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
Circuit, the court, in an opinion written by Judge Henderson and joined by Chief Judge Srinivasan and Senior Judge Rogers, affirmed the district court’s use of the terrorism enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines to impose a life sentence for his trafficking conviction. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:44 am by Eugene Volokh
" The Court found a docket from the Illinois Commerce Commission ("ICC") in case number 19-0863, Roger Shekar v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Brief of Professor Roger Colinvaux as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants-Appellees and Affirmance (American Alliance for Equal Rights v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am by Eric Goldman
Disappointingly, the Court sidestepped the larger issue of when and how a speech-protective test like Rogers v. [read post]