Search for: "US v. Samuel Gaines" Results 41 - 60 of 293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  He writes, echoing Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:28 am by Gus Hurwitz
 (Spiwak)UMC Rulemaking After Magnuson-Moss: A Textualist Approach (Samuel)National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Russian forces are continuing their attempt to reach the borders of Donestk and Luhansk but have not made any significant gains since securing Popasna on Saturday. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Tell us a little about him and his influence on John. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito wrote separately to say the changes ordered by the lower court came too close to qualifying and primaries for the fall election and could create “chaos. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
” His regular clients included Chief Justice Warren Burger, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, and Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
In practice, courts have not been well disposed to Title III plaintiffs, as scholars such as Ruth Colker and Samuel Bagenstos have demonstrated. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
Officers used false pretext to gain his wife’s consent, then claimed that such warrantless searches and seizures were permissible under the “community caretaking” doctrine established in Cady v. [read post]