Search for: "US v. Shah"
Results 41 - 60
of 360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Francois and his co-counsel, the much more experienced civil rights litigator Loren Miller, used the case to attack Plessy v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
First Party v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:36 pm
” Uthrnan v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:16 pm
Shah” “Contributory Cybersquatting and the Impending Demise of Domain Name Proxy Services? [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:07 pm
Shah – Effective March 28, 2011, sponsors and investigators of human drug and biological products subject to either an investigational new drug application ("IND") or bioavailability ("BA") or bioequivalence ("BE") studies exempt from IND requirements will have revised safety reporting requirements under the FDA regulations. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:10 am
That was the case with an expert opinion in Rughani-Shah v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:00 am
” Shah responded by referring to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:31 am
Co. v North American Specialty Ins. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:15 pm
Supp. 2d 577 (S.D.N.Y. 2007); Shah v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Hunt, Let Us Pray: The Case for Legislator-Led Prayer. 54 Tulsa Law Review 49-79 (2018). [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:52 am
See Demaco Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
” Meshell v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:25 am
In a recent unpublished (non-precedential) decision, Shah v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:25 am
In a recent unpublished (non-precedential) decision, Shah v. [read post]
