Search for: "US v. Shields"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2009, 11:32 am
In Trump v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
A parallel case (Du Daobin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:50 am
The commonly used phrase is that the 5th Amendment is not both a sword and a shield. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
However, what Shielded masterfully does is show us that America’s stark absence of constitutional accountability is not only a racial issue. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:10 pm
Annual Review The EU-US Privacy Shield is reviewed on a yearly basis, to assess that it continues to ensure an adequate level of protection of personal data. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:10 am
They’ve already lost in two courts, and my guess from oral argument in US v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 10:14 am
The appeal clarifies once again that sovereign immunity may be used only as a shield, not a sword. [read post]
Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Judging Sex & The En Banc Opinion That Reversed The Rape Shield Killing Ruling
17 May 2012, 7:06 am
Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Judging Sex & The En Banc Opinion That Reversed The Rape Shield Killing RulingBack in 2010, I posted an entry about the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Gagne v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 10:30 am
In Scheidler v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm
State Department, who will address complaints regarding the U.S. government’s use of EU citizens’ personal data. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
That month, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated Safe Harbor as a data transfer mechanism in the case Schrems v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:36 pm
Galloway, 937 F.2d 542 (10th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 418 (1992) (use of contraceptives inadmissible since use implies sexual activity); United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Applying these principles, the Court determined that class certification had been improperly denied: [W]here equitable defenses may not be used to wholly defeat the UCL cause of action (Cortez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 5:09 am
Matthias Zigann of the court's 7th Civil Chamber took perfect precautions when I attended his Sharp v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:16 am
It is well established that evidentiary privileges cannot be used as both a shield and a sword. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action? [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
” Summing up the months following the Court of Justice of the European Union’s ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
