Search for: "US v. Slater"
Results 41 - 60
of 199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Jessop v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:26 pm
Canada Slater Vecchio LLP v Arvanitis 2020 BCSC 385 a case In the Supreme Court of the British Columbia, where a law firm, who previously represented a defendant, brought a defamation action against her. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm
Wood v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
PNP v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:49 am
By Seth Fortin, Esther Slater McDonald, and Jennifer A. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
The same website has a piece about NDAs entitled “Should Canada restrict the use of gag orders in sexual abuse cases? [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
New Zealand On 15 February 2019 a judgment was handed down in the long running case of Bloomfield v Slater [2019] NZHC 171 – making public a previous interlocutory judgment in the “Whale Oil” blogger case. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am
Slater, which concerned standing under the Copyright Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am
He was not able to avoid the issue in Buck v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 3:30 am
Janus v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
The Hugh Stephens Blog has a post entitled “Fair Use or Fair Dealing? [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Slater (9th Circuit April 23, 2018). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:02 am
In Naruto v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm
Brecknell, 2018 BCCA 5 Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v Telewizja Polska, S.A. 883 F.3d 904 (D.Col.Cir. 2018) US v Vaulin 2017 WL 3334861 (N.D.Ill.2017) Nazerali v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
The article cautions against an overly reactive approach to data protection regulation, noting that many provisions of a pseudo-GDPR conflict with US laws in relation to competition, expression and trade therefore mandating a more nuanced approach that considers the distinctions of US law. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:42 am
(Although I note that David Slater, the nature photographer whose camera was used to take the photo, claims that he—and not the macaque—is in fact the author of the photo for copyright purposes.) [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:08 am
When Slater published (2015) the photo in a book of his photographs, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed suit in federal court, asserting that Slater's use of the photo infringed copyright in the photo, which (PETA asserted) belonged to the monkey. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm
, 5 MLex US Tax Watch 4 (2018). [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:01 pm
The result in Naruto v. [read post]
