Search for: "US v. William Slate"
Results 41 - 60
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
” Gordon College seeks review, arguing that all of its professors are Christian educators who are used to promote the Christian mission through teaching, scholarship, and service. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 12:03 pm
Rosenbaum, et al. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:11 am
The Delaware Court of Chancery this week upheld a board’s use of an advance notice bylaw to reject a dissident slate from running a proxy fight. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
One of those uses is "fraternity house/sorority house", where the fraternity or sorority has to be "sanctioned or recognized . . . through whatever procedures Indiana University uses to render such a sanction or recognition". [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:17 am
The Parens Patriae Model In 1892, in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:15 am
” In commentary, at the “Lawfare” blog, William S. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
But let us play out Bowman’s suggestion. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
The most time-sensitive among those cases is Trump v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:32 am
Our preview of Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Had the two Houses been so disposed—surely they would not have been given that the House elected in 2000 was controlled by Republicans and the Senate was evenly split—they could by agreement have rejected the Florida electors in favor of a slate supporting Al Gore, had one been submitted.In addition, Bush v Gore, by its own terms, is never supposed to be used as precedent.Whatever Justice Barrett and her new colleagues may want, or try, to do, the outcome of… [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
They want to prevent a “blue shift” of the kind seen in the 2018 congressional election when vote counting went on after election day and yielded greater success for the Democrats.Favoring some voters over others, merely based on the method they use to cast their vote, violates the 14th Amendment’s equal protection guarantee as the Supreme Court declared in 2000 in Bush v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
Chief Justice William Rehnquist articulated this view in his concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm
" 1 William Blackstone, Commentaries *304. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
The final 5-4 decision, Georgia v. [read post]
