Search for: "USA V. MARK PERSON"
Results 41 - 60
of 608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm
On July 4th, 2013, the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law invited experts from the USA and Europe to a colloquium to discuss the consequences of the US Supreme Court’s decision in the proceedings Kiobel v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:34 am
Is there any way that Bayer v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:16 pm
They’re no longer publicly visible…” The case is Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 11:05 am
Applicant claims that in Matal v. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 4:36 am
Haldex Brake Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:23 am
L’Oreal S.A. and L’Oreal USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
USA v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
Cavern City Tours Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:38 am
Last week marked More Than Just a Game V - the London edition.MTJG (as it is known by those in the know) is an international series of academic-led conferences on Games and Interactive Entertainment Law attracting an international network of researchers and legal professionals who are passionate about the most successful and fastest-growing of the Creative Industries.Anne Rose (Mishcon de Reya) attended the conference and has provided this summary of some of the more IP relevant… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
" * Multiple personality disorder amongst the public for Community designs? [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:44 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:42 am
Moreover, opposer's CEO lacked personal knowledge as to whether Mini Mania ever labeled its products with the mark. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:24 am
World Axe Throwing League, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
As a result, condition (v) was deemed satisfied.Turning to likelihood of confusion (condition (vi)), the court recalled that this requires a global appreciation, taking into account all relevant factors, and must be undertaken from the perspective of the average consumer (see Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41).Benefit submitted that no such likelihood of confusion would subsist because of case law (notably Nestle v… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:16 am
Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Applicant unsuccessfully argued, based on its interpretation of the CAFC's decision in Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
(hereinafter Applicant) v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am
A Safe Harbour framework had been put in place between Europe and the USA regarding transfers of personal data.(2) In light of the Snowden revelations, Mr Schrems, an Austrian lawyer who runs the “Europe v Facebook” group, made a complaint to the Data Protection Commissioner arguing that the Commissioner should direct that transfers of personal data from Facebook Ireland to Facebook in the USA should cease. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
’ L'Oreal USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 3:38 am
Sunpoint International Group USA Corp., 2021 U.S.P.Q.2d 785 (TTAB 2021) [precedential]. [read post]
