Search for: "USA v. Ables"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Once upon a time, AC was able to convince universities to hold their noses and pay a $3.38 FTE cost and offload the $0.10 per page “course pack” charge directly to students. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:48 am
Zimmerman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
Arab Bank (2018), and Nestlé USA v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:12 pm
The recent opinion in Bautech USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
The distributor liability model adopted in Europe, and the S.230 conduit model in the USA, were for the protection of users as much, if not more so, than for the benefit of platforms. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
Wie löst Maria Winkler das Problem mit dem Daten-Export in die USA? [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am
The distributor liability model adopted in Europe, and the S.230 conduit model in the USA, were for the protection of users as much, if not more so, than for the benefit of platforms. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The case is Villalpando v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:04 am
The DPC observed that parties “falling within the definition of an electronic communications service provider [“ECS”] subject to the FISA 702 PRISM programme may equally fall foul of the requirements of Chapter V GDPR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights regarding their transfers of personal data to the USA” (paragraph 10.11). [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:01 pm
For example, U.S. prosecutors may now be able to issue Bank of Nova Scotia or USA PATRIOT Act subpoenas to obtain foreig [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:34 am
Access Copyright and the SOCAN v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, 140 S. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:53 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Clapper v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:19 pm
Amnesty International USA, 568 U.S. 398 (2013). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
