Search for: "USA v. Lord"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am
”[5] Comments There are five comments that could be made about the Court of Appeal’s decision (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U. v VTLS.[6] First, the Court of Appeal (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U. v VTLS[7] followed Oputa JSC’s obiter dictum in Sonnar (Nig) Ltd v Partenreedri MS Norwind.[8] It should be stressed that Oputa JSC’s obiter dictum is not binding on lower courts according to the Nigerian common law doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am
Lord Ken Macdonald QC, the former DPP, recently suggested that policing the accuracy of information on the internet is “an unmanageable task”. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
The fourth appellant, Halligen, is a British citizen whose extradition is sought by the USA under Part 2 of the Extradition Act 2000. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:11 am
I read the latest filing by the special prosecutors in USA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Question is not “are the US in breach”, the question is “how are the USA going to react if UK says breach? [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
It’s a system which has generally worked well over the years and is a world away from, say, the absurdity of politically appointed judges in the USA. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
District Judge Purdy noted, Very powerful observations do come from Lord Phillips, PSC in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9 (@ para 67) … His Lordship said “extradition proceedings should not become the occasion for a debate about the most convenient forum for criminal proceedings…Unless the judge reaches the conclusion that the scales are finely balanced he should not enter into any enquiry as to the possibility of prosecution in this country. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
Lord Lloyd-Jones gave the judgment, with which all members of the Court agreed. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
It was announced this week that Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation will not be prosecuted in the USA in relation to phone hacking. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:28 am
USA v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 9:34 am
” It will come as no surprise to many IPKat readers that a U.S. court has found that the SCC order is not enforceable in the USA. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:04 am
She wanted to recover the cost of a commercial surrogacy arrangement in the USA and to use donor eggs. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:04 pm
Rooney, Coulson, Hague: balancing privacy and expression Revisited and Updated: Strasbourg on Privacy and Reputation, Part 3 Defamation Damages: USA and England Compared Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1: The European Convention Alastair Brett – as he leaves The Times, Lectures: Lord Neuberger on the balance between privacy and freedom of expression Libel Reform Debate: Part 1 “Burden of Proof” Case Law: Political Blog Libel Action… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Amnesty International USA, 133 S. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
As Lord Justice Goldring said: "12. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
Both Joan Biskupic of USA Today and Adam Liptak of the New York Times preview Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, while Orin Kerr also explains why al-Kidd is a “strange case” for this blog. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis appealAfter… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
This principle was applied to the press in R v Crook (1991) 93 Cr App R (2) 37 in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:06 pm
” The article was based on an FBI Complaint that was filed in the USA. [read post]
