Search for: "Uniform District Court Rules"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,019
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 6:59 am
The Court ruled that there was no collective to “decertify” because Plaintiff had not conclusively shown that the opt-ins worked overtime under a uniform policy of the company but rather chose to work overtime based on their own decisions under differing individual circumstances. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Thus, if SKJ were upset with the majority for ruling out federal district court determinations of Section 3 ineligibility, they should not have voted to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court at all.So maybe SKJ have in mind some different posture for adjudication of Section 3 eligibility. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§1–1–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
The court further observed, based on the statutory text, that Section 8-110 was a mandatory rule that could not be altered by a choice-of-law clause. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:07 am
The district court agreed with Great Lakes and rejected Raiders’ counterclaims. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm
To maintain this uniformity, federal courts follow established maritime rules. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, arguing that Pennsylvania law should apply. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:39 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:18 pm
The Supreme Court of Estonia is handling an appeal lodged by the former Tartu mayor, Aivar Soop, challenging his convictions of embezzlement and wilful breach of the public procurement rules. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
The Court explained that a flywheel was a very old and common mechanism for improving uniformity of motion in machinery. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:30 am
The decision could have broad implications given that other state courts have deferred ruling until the Supreme Court weighs in on Trump’s eligibility. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
” In response to Justice Kagan’s concern, Jason Murray (counsel for the Anderson respondents) wisely signaled that it’s not the plaintiffs’ objective to have Colorado, or Wisconsin, or Michigan, unilaterally determine Trump’s eligibility: They brought this case so that the Supreme Court itself could made a definitive, uniform determination for the nation. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The “uniform” in the name refers to the use of the same exam across multiple jurisdictions. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 5:20 am
Understanding the UCCJEA The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is a uniform law adopted by 49 states, including Illinois and the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
And even when juries are empaneled and empowered in federal courts, the jury pool from which they are drawn is the federal district (rather than a county as in state court), which can result in profound demographic differences in the makeup of the jury. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Therefore, the district court ruled, the ABC test would apply to such claims. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
Therefore, if this had been “real life,” the judge would have ruled in favor of applicant to hold the 2010 head injury not barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
But the rules on MPs’ travel could be about to change. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:10 pm
As the court noted, Disney is “not the district’s only landowner, and other landowners within the district are affected by the same laws. [read post]
