Search for: "United States v. American Can Co." Results 41 - 60 of 3,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
So every time a relative sues to try to get damages for the death of a relative in the United States, those are all statutory. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am by John Coyle
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
My UCLA School of Law students Aaron Boudaie, Eimile Nolan, and Simon Ruhland and I had filed an amicus brief, on behalf of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), PEN American Center, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Something similar can be said about women. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm by Steven Calabresi
 We strongly suspect that most American juries or judicial fact-finders or district attorneys would have the same reaction to Edwards v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Drexel Furniture Co., it overturned the Child Labor Tax Law. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am by Nathan Dorn
Mathew Carey is well-known for printing the Catholic bible (the Douay Bible) for the first time in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
He had, after all, convinced the Supreme Court as the victorious lawyer in Dred Scott that the Constitution forbade bans on slavery in American territories, prohibited freed slaves from becoming citizens of the United States and regarded African-Americans as having no rights white American citizens were obligated to respect. [read post]