Search for: "United States v. Di Re"
Results 41 - 60
of 874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
,v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
They want access to our markets without being held responsible for the damage they are causing to consumers here in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The point is that an injunction against the United States cannot, ever, be “unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
Statutes that exist in favor of grandparents or step-parents have been deemed unconstitutional by the United States Supreme court. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
" and that "everyone will blow their brains out if you're still the mayor. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Arguably, we’re so immersed in them that we know more about US law, especially relating to civil rights, than we do about Canadian rights. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
DIS=151622 [2] For the legal statement, please refer to: https://technation.io/lawtechukpanel/ [3] For the decision of Ruscoe v Cryptopia Ltd (In Liquidation) [2020] NZHC 728, please refer to: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2020/728.html [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 4:17 am
Here is the complaint: Cooley v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
