Search for: "United Food & Commercial v. City Foods, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
City of Long Beach 14-151Issue: (1) Whether the Heck v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of San Diego v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
” City National Bank v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
In Haag v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
But the line of reasoning that focuses on the old, common law definition of larceny neglects to take account of the fact that the modern definition of property for purposes of theft statutes has been broadened to include both tangible and intangible property.5 For example, the paradigmatic Model Penal Code, published first in 1962 by the sages at the American Law Institute, defines property for purposes of theft very broadly: “‘property’ means anything of value, including real… [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
The leading case appears to be the Fourth Circuit's 1999 ruling in Food Lion Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Shulte, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC 406.6M Kajeet Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
” Barney Greengrass, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:31 pm
In Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
See Time, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Title: Fast Break Foods LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:38 am
The rationale for extending the statute to situations such as this was to protect and enhance the commercial reputation of New York by regulating not only franchise offers directed at New York from other states, but also those originating in New York, from New York-based franchisors, in the court’s view.The July 7 opinion in A Love of Food I, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
See Time, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
In Food Lion Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Random House, Inc.[10] and in New Era Publications Int'l v. [read post]
