Search for: "United States' Opposition to Companies' Motion to Strike"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 11:17 am
Back in the United States, however, opposition to the ongoing negotiations appears to be growing stronger. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Paul Alan Levy This week the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an excellent decision rejecting a series of bogus trademark claims and hence a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by Ascentive, a software maker, against Opinion Corp., whose PissedConsumer web site provides a forum for consumers to post complaints (or praise). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Kentucky analysis, requiring the defense to prove that its strikes were not motivated by race, while simultaneously requiring it to prove that the state's strikes were motivated by race, violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Louisiana)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Title: Guevara v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 6:23 am
" But that pre-emptive strike probably won't end the debate. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
No. 08 Civ. 7810 (LTS)(JCF).United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, No. 15 C 7755, United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:02 am
""To be sure, Mueller can be regarded as a biased observer in light of his personal opposition to Qualcomm's business model, but his analytical track record is nothing to scoff at; for instance, he correctly predicted that the FTC would win its important motion for summary judgment. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Their argument is that, merely by registering to do business in a state and/or appointing an agent for service of process, a company impliedly consents to general jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(j) United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(IP Whiteboard) ICANN development 1: The [.xxx] Factor (IP Whiteboard) Global – Patents Nokia buries patent hatchet with Apple to help fund Windows Phone 7 switch (ArsTechnica) (PatLit) (Tangible IP) Patent licensing fees modest in total cost of ownership for cellular (IP finance) Africa WIPO Director General announces Rights Registry Project for West African States (WIPO) (Afro-IP) Australia Aussie anti-piracy group backflips on 3 strikes backflip… [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
The court reasoned that the Federal Rules of Evidence, by their own terms, “apply to proceedings in United States courts. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm
The ACDP reminded Parliament that “in the United States of America, fair use has been developed over a period of a 150 years of jurisprudence, while South Africa does not have this case law history or experience”. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
With the exception of a defensive strike in October 2016, U.S. forces are not taking direct military action in this Saudi-led effort in Yemen. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
They and other national and local GOP officials cast their opposition to such measures as an effort to protect personal choice. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
(IP finance) United Kingdom Digital Economy Act emerges from judicial review largely unscathed (IP Osgoode) (Out Law) P2P lawyer fined after £5.99 web host falls to Anonymous attacks (ArsTechnica) Small application, streamlined track: copyright licences hit the fast lane (IPKat) United States US General The PROTECT-IP Act: COICA redux (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Technology Liberation Front) (Copyright… [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
There, the question was whether the logo was an official insignia falling with Section 2(b), i.e., was it “of the same class as the flag or coats of arms of the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
An Italian company, Dada & Co. [read post]
