Search for: "United States, Appellee, v. John Doe, Defendant-appellant" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
Citibank, the attorney for the defendant had submitted a controverting fee affidavit in opposition to the creditor’s motion for summary judgment, but the appellate court ultimately found it deficient because it did not specifically attest to what alternative hourly rate would have been reasonable.Duran's attorney, John Mastriani, filed an affidavit in which he stated that he is "familiar with the normal and customary attorney fees for an action… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:32 am by WSLL
Likewise, the United States Constitution does not require counsel for indigent defendants seeking post-conviction relief. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 3:02 am
State: Whether the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm by charlesgriffin
Lymas contends that the damage caps violate the Mississippi Constitution and the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:39 am by Meg Martin
Cosco, Pro se.Representing Appellee (Defendant): Bruce A. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Plaintiff-Appellant Jose Antonio Rodriguez ("Rodriguez") sued his former employer, Defendant-Appellee FedEx Freight East, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:31 am
Guthrie, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): John D. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Johns–Manville Corp., 539 A.2d 871 (1988), where the defendants were asbestos manufacturers headquartered in Pennsylvania and the plaintiff was a New Jersey resident injured, mostly, in New Jersey (but also a little in Pennsylvania). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
Any arbitration shall be conducted in Harris County, Texas, United States of America in the English language. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
More specifically, Jerman claims that Defendants violated the FDCPA by representing to Jerman that her debt would be assumed valid unless she disputed the debt "in writing" even though the FDCPA does concluding that, although Defendants violated the FDCPA by instructing Jerman that she must dispute the debt in writing, Defendants qualified for the FDCPA bona fide error defense, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm by WSLL
Fenn, Judge.Representing Appellant: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina N. [read post]