Search for: "United States of America v. An Amount of Funds up to but not to exceed "
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
Most care giving in America continues to be provided gratuitously by family members at tremendous cost to the caregivers. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
The Aurora employee sent a letter following up on theconversation. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
As John Ikerd, Professor Emeritus of Agricultural Economics at the University of Missouri, Columbia, takes up the issue in a presentation entitled "Reweaving the Fabric of Rural America: Food as a Common Thread. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
Subsidies might be a different way of funding; the demand/interest is there, but people don’t pay on a per unit basis. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
 Foreclosures across his state now consistently exceed 7,000 a month. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
V. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
The amount paid to the nominator may "not exceed the amount expended by the corporation in connection with such election. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Using the judicial pay raise as cover for a legislative one, given the fact that our raise will, at a minimum, be effective two years prior to that of the Legislature, is a gap in time that far exceeds the institutional memory of the voting electorate. [read post]
