Search for: "United States v. 44 CASES, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:57 pm
See, for example, Trimex v Vedanta, where the Supreme Court did not cite even a single Indian decision related to the case when there were at least three to four Indian decisions relating to the issue. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:22 am
Ed. 2d 44 (1993). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
Is it about combatting residential segregation to achieve a more integrated set of living patterns across the United States? [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:47 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC Cir. 1923). [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Garza, as well as a number of important cases in state or circuit courts.) [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Proof allowed in Heather Capital case. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Class 44 IDs don’t contain gay, lesbian, transgender, but prostitution services in the state of Nevada are in there. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882);… [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
I stupidly stuck to the notion that everyone is equal under the law etc. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:18 pm
Corporate VeilIt is as easy to state that the origin of the separate entity principle is often traced to Salomon v Salomon as it is difficult to outline when a court will lift the veil. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Neeley v NameMedia Inc, et al (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) Is a fully briefed Eighth Circuit appeal that will be ignored by the United States Courts because of being pro se and IFP. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Edgar, 44 Va. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Edgar, 44 Va. [read post]
