Search for: "United States v. ARTICLE OR DEVICE, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
The legal framework (categories and criteria of assessment) consolidates elements coming from various sources, both internal and external to the EU: from EU State aid law to the subsidy chapters in the most recent PTAs negotiated by the EU, from multilateral trade law (see the expired presumptions in Article 6.1 WTO ASCM) to more recent subsidy initiatives (see the draft rules of the ‘Trilateral’ Initiative: January 2020). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:14 am
However, please keep in mind that an article such as this is no substitute for a conversation with a copyright attorney. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
But his skepticism about oaths certainly extends to quasi-religious oaths like those exacted from the President and, under Article VI, all public officials, whether state or national. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 12:32 pm
Importantly, claims regarding security screenings are exceedingly rare under federal law following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
Patent System The US patent laws are set out in Title 35 of the United States Code (35 U.S.C.). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
(For more on the complexities associated with weapons review for cyber capabilities, see this recent article in International Law Studies by Jeffrey Biller and Mike Schmitt.) 3. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:48 am
United States, 573 F. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
United States, Docket 2018-1206) [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm
In Tracy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:55 am
Unlike the United States, an invalidation action before the PRB usually would not stay the infringement proceeding for invention patent. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
Grewal used to serve as a United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Here is John’s article. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In the Jones Case (2012) (United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
