Search for: "United States v. American MacHinery Co." Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Trump celebrated his 365th day as president of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Michael O'Brien
  Next to speak on the matter was Judge Richard Posner, sitting by designation in Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat)… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” [emphasis added]—John Irwin, Prisons in Turmoil (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm by Carl Esbeck
  Just last year Justice Alito reminded us “that the autonomy of religious groups, both here in the United States and abroad, has often served as a shield against oppressive civil laws. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:33 am
In his famous, and often-cited, concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997)(quoting United States Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation maintains operations and well sites throughout the United States and contracts with third party staffing companies to acquire laborers and consultants. [read post]