Search for: "United States v. Balde" Results 41 - 60 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm by Unknown
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo–Hopi Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) United States of America v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United States of America Rugby Football Union, Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 3553885 (D. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:07 am by Mary A. Fischer
” The favorable ruling by the United States Court of Appeals in September 2009 further buoyed their confidence. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am by Amy Howe
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen previews Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:28 am by Ben Vernia
While Folliard has alleged that HP “knowingly submitted, and caused to be submitted, false or fraudulent claims for payment and reimbursement by the United States Government,” and the United States has paid these false claims, he has failed to plead any facts supporting this bald recitation of the statute. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:42 am
The Corps stated that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) had ultimately determined that the upland portion of the site was not a suitable bald eagle habitat, and that a consultation pursuant to 16 U.S.C. ? [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:34 am by admin
[E]ven in the United States there appears to be several trade marks which incorporate the words “magic bra” and therefore even in the United States the term is common or descriptive….. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:37 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Specifically, applying the heightened pleading standard required by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]