Search for: "United States v. Barker"
Results 41 - 60
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 7:31 pm
" The Court cited the 1972 United States Supreme Court case of Barker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
On appeal, the Vermont Supreme Court applied the four-part test set out in Barker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Patent No. 8,177,449• Count V for Patent Infringement: Inducement To Infringe U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
Accord, United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:50 am
SecureCam-v-Project-Complaint [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:50 am
SecureCam-v-Project-Complaint [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 10:03 am
Skype, Inc., et al, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Case No. 2:09-cv-01364-RSM. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:45 pm
Barker Olmsted & Barnier, APLC [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:33 pm
"); Washington State Grange v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:08 am
Harvey is the wettest tropical cyclone on record in the United States with peak accumulations of 64.58 inches. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:52 am
Barker and London-Sire v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
State, stating “[a]lthough such a defendant cannot advance a due diligence defense, he has the statutory twenty-day remedy, and in appropriate circumstances, may have a Constitutional speedy hearing claim under Barker v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm
Eldridge or the test employed in Barker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
Ninth Circuit’s Pro-PAGA Decision Is Not the Death Knell for Class Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
1 Oct 2015, 7:34 pm
The decision appears contrary to the United States Supreme Court holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
Bell-v-Cystic-Complaint [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:22 am
Normally, Justice Sotomayor notes, the Court would not grant cert. to resolve simply a mistaken application, or even an erroneous fact-bound determination, of the four Barker v. [read post]
