Search for: "United States v. Box" Results 41 - 60 of 2,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 2 February 2024, there was a trial on preliminary issues in the case of Jeffrey Hinds v British Boxing Board of Control Limited QB-2020-003448. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Mehta and Kaitlyn Box have thoughts: "The Supreme Court on January 17, 2024 heard arguments in two cases – R elentless, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
United States Former President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay writer, E Jean Carroll, $83.3 million in her defamation claim against him. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
Fair enough.But the United States decided to go further. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
During Tuesday’s oral argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Removing a Juror for Cause The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed…. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Hina Shamsi
Since 2003, the U.S. government has operated a No Fly List that indefinitely bars U.S. citizens and residents from flying to, from, or over the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
United States law determines this by considering: (1) whether the accused infringer actually had access to the original work; and (2) whether the accused infringing work is “substantially similar” to the original work. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
This parallels developments in other common law jurisdictions such as the United States, England and Australia where guidance for lawyers on the ethical use of generative AI is starting to emerge. [read post]