Search for: "United States v. CERTAIN LAND, ETC." Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 8:52 am by Charon QC
Dominic Lawson, writing in the i newspaper, summed it up quite well when he stated that many who read of the exploits of the shaggers…  actors, footballers etc etc – role models for the future of our Big Society – are more likely to be impressed than horrified. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm by Katharine Allen and Sean Maffett
The public comment period for the Proposed Rule expires on April 8, 2024.[1] Affected Transactions and Transferees The Proposed Rule broadly captures transactions involving residential real property (including single-family houses, townhouses, condominiums, and cooperatives, as well as apartment buildings designed for one to four families) located anywhere in the United States (including any Indian lands, as that term is defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [OK, if you say so, though I kind of thought the restraints on states’ abrogation of contracts, ex post facto laws, etc. were mandatory and ©/patent were optional.] [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
     PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am by Rick Hasen
” Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act subjects certain States and political subdivisions to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which invades the sovereignty of these “covered” jurisdictions by requiring them to “preclear” all voting changes (redistricting, moving polling places, etc.) with the United States Department of Justice or the District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by W. Casey Biggerstaff
Proponents of adhering strictly to classic (or “absolute”) neutrality rules, such as those outlined in the 1907 Hague Conventions V and XIII Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land and in Naval War, argue that certain types of support violates neutral States’ legal obligations of abstention (or non-participation) and impartiality and thereby constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
., number and type of projects approved, applications made, construction data, etc.) as specified, to the Department of Housing and Community Development. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
My decision to vote in favour of the measures indicated rests on the plausible claim by South Africa that certain statements by Israeli State officials, including members of its military, give rise to a real and imminent risk of irreparable prejudice to the rights of Palestinians under the Genocide Convention (see paragraphs 50-52 of the Order). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
License Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreements Know-How Right of First Refusal Contract Interpretation Extrinsic Evidence of a Contemporaneous Oral Agreement Parol Evidence Rule Breach of Contract Equitable Estoppel DefenseIowa LawContract Drafting   Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa – Central Wildhawk Investments, LLC (“Wildhawk”) initiated this breach of contract… [read post]