Search for: "United States v. COMMANDING OFFICER, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
Translated into simplified terms relevant to the present case, this means that a federal law enforcement officer can ask a United States Magistrate Judge to issue a warrant compelling an email service provider (e.g. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
" I disagreed with that—perhaps not clearly enough—by making a point that Chief Justice Rehnquist had in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
United States in particular, these lower courts have reminded federal authorities that “[t]he Federal government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
We also consider what about law gives it a special quality that distinguishes it from other forms of command, guidelines or direction. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:50 am
"`Forthwith' subpoenas should be used only when an immediate response is justified and then only with the prior approval of the United States Attorney. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
The only other mention of religion in the United States Constitution is the prohibition against religious tests “as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States,” which is contained in Article VI. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 10:26 am
Are these restrictions an unconstitutional infringement by Congress on the President’s own powers under Article II (as Commander in Chief, etc.)? [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
In each of these branches of military, the President of the United States is the commander in chief of the armed forces. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm
In short, the NCD and Office of the NCD would resemble the structure of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, albeit with a smaller scale. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:43 am
I, III, IV and V could be changed and have the resulting entity still be worthy of the name "The Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
United States, the First Amendment broadly protects political expression in order to “assure [the] unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:13 am
Kodner is simply tired of it all having commandeered our dining room. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
The remainder of JUSTICE GORSUCH's opinion does not command a majority. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
Suppose that President Truman, the second Baptist president, had taken to convening a daily Orthodox minyan in the Oval Office, pressing prayer shawls and yarmulkes on Clark Clifford, Secretary of State George C. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
State v. [read post]
